Originally posted by Key Sole
Well you could say that mate in a roundabout way.
But from PUR’s last announcement the Concentrate for PUR is higher. But remembering these are from ‘Historical Drill Results’ though. An item if Note I have stated numerous times.
At the moment I am backing TNO due to the testing and Mass recovery of ‘fresh’ drilling. This is proven, tested & in shallow depth, hence why ultimately the recovery should be better
I still hold some PUR, but it will be a long road. TNO will be producing pretty quickly imo
Actually, PUR's latest results are from their own drilling on the Airijoki Project in Sweden. They completed that drill program in early December, so not from historical drill holes. On that basis PUR and TNO are a close comparison.
