Im a mug punter offering an opinion based on my view which could be and probably is wrong
so if they are entitled to the income MMX recieved from 24% of Jack Hills investment how does that work?
I see what your saying though MMX has spent alot of money developing and advancing Jack Hills
I wonder if that could then mean that CHM are entitled to 24% of the future income of Jack Hills less all the expenses and costs MMX have incureed to date?
sort of like a net royalty
but then CHM would have to fund 24% of future developments
oh dear Ive gone cross eyed and confused myself
Im in for a punt I'll await the account for profits and let the experts tell me the mug what its worth
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ann out "chameleon wins murchison litigation"
Im a mug punter offering an opinion based on my view which could...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist