I read it as CHM get 10m x 1.50 for Grimildi transaction and it also reads that the judge threw out the constructive case against MMX and awarded CHM a fundicary fee instead. Noting that CHm made up 24% of original purchase price of jack hills and the judge said MMX have to account to CHM for the income dirived for that investment. No where does it say CHM now have 24/25 % of Jack Hills.
I read it as CHM get 10m x 1.50 for Grimildi transaction and it...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 43 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
