CHM 4.17% 1.2¢ chimeric therapeutics limited

No mate, that was CHM's summary.If you read the actually court...

  1. 2,345 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 539
    No mate, that was CHM's summary.

    If you read the actually court document - it specifically says why CHM is NOT entitled to 24% of the asset - that being becasue MMX had to fund the development of the asset itself.

    From MMX, CHM get about $150,000 escalated - not even half a million.

    From the other ex director - they get 10m shares - so about $15m, but that doesnt come from MMX and has no tie to Jack Hills.

    How can CHM reasonably expect to have 24% of the current market value of the asset which they havent funded the development or exploration for.

    If that was the case,they could wait another 4 years until Jack Hills (Stage 1 and 2) are in production and then just get 25% of the profit for free. No you got to invest something to make a return.

    Sorry try buying into a "Real" business if you want a cash flow stream. I think MMX is undervalued, and once this court case is blown over - there lies little uncertainty - ie less risk - ie. lower discount rate - ie higher valuation!!

    Disclaimer - The above represents my opinion only and should not be used as a basis to any financial or investment decision. Always exercise your own due diligence first.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add CHM (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.