ann out "chameleon wins murchison litigation", page-14

No mate, that was CHM's summary.

If you read the actually court document - it specifically says why CHM is NOT entitled to 24% of the asset - that being becasue MMX had to fund the development of the asset itself.

From MMX, CHM get about $150,000 escalated - not even half a million.

From the other ex director - they get 10m shares - so about $15m, but that doesnt come from MMX and has no tie to Jack Hills.

How can CHM reasonably expect to have 24% of the current market value of the asset which they havent funded the development or exploration for.

If that was the case,they could wait another 4 years until Jack Hills (Stage 1 and 2) are in production and then just get 25% of the profit for free. No you got to invest something to make a return.

Sorry try buying into a "Real" business if you want a cash flow stream. I think MMX is undervalued, and once this court case is blown over - there lies little uncertainty - ie less risk - ie. lower discount rate - ie higher valuation!!

Disclaimer - The above represents my opinion only and should not be used as a basis to any financial or investment decision. Always exercise your own due diligence first.