ORE 5.11% $6.13 orocobre limited

minerva, I think there is more than a bit of truth to that. My...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. niu
    1,510 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 270
    minerva, I think there is more than a bit of truth to that. My take on the ponds is that they are big enough in an average year - maybe even in a slightly worse than average year - but they don't have enough capacity to be ok in, say, 90% of all years. I suspect that they are not far wide of the mark and the head start on stage 2 ponds should provide some relief in the short term and may be enough in the longer term. If not, keep on building ponds...

    More harvest pond capacity is a must - they have to be able to take full advantage of the good months/years to build a substantial inventory at the end of the evaporation sequence. There is a slight complication in that they don't want to concentrate much beyond 0.7% or they start precipitating lithium, but I am sure they can think their way through that.

    The crystallisers worry me - it feels like a band-aid solution. If they are in low evaporation conditions and the crystallisers enable them to carry on happily with lower concentration in the harvest ponds, I can see them over-pulling the whole pond sequence and getting a little messed up throughout the system. In any case, if they are hell bent on doing it, I hope their test work on the crystallisers is repeated at altitude before they commit several million of capex to this option.
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ORE (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.