Ann: OHD Project Update, page-199

IMO we have been fooled or allowed ourselves to derail the issue.

IMO the mention of PDU in the announcement was two folds;

1- To provide as a first layer for a sheet sandwich, the main/middle layer being "F'ed up OHD" and third layer (again only used for completing the sheet sandwich) was continuation of (pot) trials. Both non-essential layers are just talks & ideas.

2- Use of the PDU  (& "continued" trials) in the announcement  is likely, yet again, just setting grounds for future CR which seems  to serve to pay management salaries (as reflected by the only tangible outcome in the past many years).

I may be wrong but as I unserestand the PDU was supposed to be here by now or some time ago! But it appears  GPP has enough money for whatever purose of use for now and new timeline of PDU as mid 2019 may just conveniently be the time the funds which would be needed to pay the salaries runs out ... again ... of course .... Ah ... forgot "consultant" fees.

There is also the aspect delay/timing of anmouncement re info received from Monsh and the timing of Genetsl Meeting with voting on resolutions, which has been discussed here. Has anyone received response frim managemet to query as to the date "in May 2018" when info was received by GPP from Monash?

This is not an advice but just general info for those who may wish to put a complaint with ASIC, here is the link:

https://compliance.asic.gov.au/#/form/583b77dc397bbc319837ea2a/app/5b0d33268c212109dca8f81f

If you cannot get to it, look for "report misconduct"  (instead of "complaint about a company"). It takes about 5 min to register a complaint.