If go back and look at the OHD trial Anns, they were applying it...

If go back and look at the OHD trial Anns, they were applying it at 5 litres per hectare, 10 l/ha, 30 l/ha and 70 l/ha. The best results were at 5 litres per hectare from recollection, albeit for wheat the results were ok to 30 litres per hectare. At 70 litres per hectare results not so great (over-fertilisation from recollection). At the time of the results I said that the lab is different to the field so all it did was prove a concept but the real test was in the field, which they have utterly bollocksed up in the latest Ann.

My take from the diatribe of Ann showing absolute incompetence is that they have over-fertilised so growth rates were probably quite low and possibly below par the control (over-fertilisation concept). If that hypothesis is correct that means the other trials were fine but obviously management need to come and clean and inform holders of when the errors started. When did they start stuffing up as they need to ensure the market that te earlier results were fine - all silence from managment means they are all going back to kindergarden to find an answer, and as for Monash wow Ididn't know the scientific community has forgotten about basic principles.

Now, some might recall that a while back we were debating why slowness in trials and the comment was that not enough OHD coming in for the trials. Well my take if my hypothesis is correct was they were supplied enough, they were just to stupid to realise that it was 4 times the concentration and they needed to be dilute it down (meaning they could have got more trials) to the right mix. The incompetence is very telling here and to be frank absolutely embarrassing. Anyone working in a lab knows the first thing you do is test the formula to see the mix is fine before you do anything. Uselessness at its finest.

As I said I am here for Morabisi but thought I would share my hypothesis here. For the record unless the results are good I will be selling out later this month as need to claim losses here to offset gains I made elsewhere. The way the cooky crumbles.

Could be wrong on the hypothesis as well but thought I would share and see if others have a view, but as I said it is up to management to come clean and also say why they thought they deserved those options more recently LOL.

All IMO IMO