Hi
@seuss, re: another thread, be warned, don’t speak ill of directors, when it comes to peoples opinions of their companies directors the following seems to apply.
If a director has a good history or track record then it’s relevant!
If a director has a bad track record or dodgy past it’s OLD news and therefor not relevant!
You know, the old saying “It’ll be different this time” because I have invested! Go figure!
Then if it all goes south, the bad track record or past miraculously becomes relevant as the cheer leaders turn against the director(s)
