Ann: Notice received under Section 249D of the Corporations Act, page-106

nah I am not a wanna be, I am just filling in time, but the facts remain that the shareholders are entitled to know who they are going to vote for and what there credentials are, how they feel the mess can be fixed and what they will do to fix it, your the one that keeps bringing you, fooca and young tiger in here not me, of course all the attention should be on the 249D, this shiny new toy your getting excited about may or may not happen, but the 249D is and will, whether I am a holder or non holder I dont think it should matter too much, do you, oh of course you do silly me you mentioned it, I have been only focusing on what is right for shareholders but unfortunately you cant see it, once again as fooca has stated the CVs will be limited to X amount of words, so I say the wannabes should come in and inform the group as to there credentials and intentions, I mean a select group has been told so how about the rest of the holders or should they just vote blindly and hope for the best, they get one chance to fix this with there vote and they need to have the knowledge to make a proper decision, of course if you and a few others feel that shareholders dont have the right to fully understand who they are voting for then continue questioning my posts, they wont change, but maybe neither will management, especially if the wannabes wont declare