Ann: Notice of General Meeting/Proxy Form, page-173

Lol.
No more from me on this as you've proven my point and I'm not looking to flood the threads here.

Wise of me though to elaborate because it was apparent you were seeking to trick your way out of it.

The whole point of my proposal was to demonstrate how negative the consolidation will turn out IMO.

Something I believe you probably know but refuse to acknowledge just so you can set out to argue or "bully" others claiming otherwise.

Look at how ridiculous your wager is. "...the price will at some stage trade above the consolidation price within the next 365 days." - Yeah, and? So what? You're now saying, as an example, if the revised SP is 4c and it trades at 4.5c on the first day, then retract continually thereafter, maybe 50% maybe more, that would still warrant the consolidation as being deemed a positive? Please... Give us a spell, champ.

Enjoy the final word.