yes I am, actually (over 30 years' experience), though I am not...

yes I am, actually (over 30 years' experience), though I am not invested in CVS. I keep them on my radar because I have been interested in the Paynes gold field for some time and want to see what CVS will do with it. If they start looking promising I might invest.

In the meantime, I comment on ppl's misconceptions about exploration. The one on RAB geochemistry was a beauty. If RAB could define an economic orebody, then companies would not use RC or DDH as its about a fifth the cost! Most RAB doesn't intersect economic mineralisation, but it does define geochemical anomalism. 0.48% is highly anomalous.

(btw, I said 0.48% isn't economic, not 8%! I could expand on that: 0.48% is not economic for a sulphide Ni normally. It can be for lateritic (bulk) Ni, but thats not what CVS' announcement was about).