@martincooper, if you do nothing else tonight, then this stuff is the moral to the story this evening. Consider this post to be advice, though not of a financial nature
My ex-shareholder comrade has:
- carpeted me for misquoting his selling price, which was 10% askew from his actual.
- made the misguided accusation that I suggested that I have held CCE shares longer than himself.
- mentions that he sent some correspondence to the appropriate authorities.
- been generally derogatory to me, using terms like 'troll'
@martincooper, the lesson is this. Best chance to actually link the announcement (or announcement(s), allegedly) that he is so concerned about that he has sent his worry - in writing - off to the ASX.
But nowhere, NOWHERE has he shown you his concerns. Where's the link, Martin? Why thank someone for taking up your proxy, then refusing to reveal their purported evidence of impropriety?
As I have said to you, Martin, believe nothing at face value. Given a perfect opportunity to profer the link to an announcement regarding his concerns he has deflected to personal criticism of a third party he no longer speaks to. Where are his priorities, regarding what YOU know about his mind? Why is he only telling you that he thinks Treefern is an idiot, rather than linking the problems he personally believes he has identified with the company?
See the 'link' and the 'evidence', Martin, before you thank anybody.
