How is this not a total DOWNRAMP? You can't hide behind the...

How is this not a total DOWNRAMP?

You can't hide behind the ..."I'm just giving my opinion!" here

Your MAKING up facts.
The GXY/POSCO deal JUST needs a rubber stamp from a land/mining judge.
You then try and STATE as fact that the deal is falling apart? Try reading the GXY ASX updates.

Then from there...THEN you IMO the thing all over...POSCO paid too much. Have you even looked at the GXY NPV? POSCO paid fair value and may have got a bit of a deal. That's MY IMO!

Then you start to state GLN is going to start buying other companies (Not as long as you keep DOWNRAMPING GLNs SP it won't)...JP will not have a strong SP to bargain with.

Then you actually post link a to Livent's qtr. talking about how bad this is...What are you doing mate!?!?
IMO...your trying to take money from GLN SHs to get cheaper shares...

I'm wrong you say???

You believe (IMO!) GLN after all 5 drill holes that are the same as the first...you state 50 cents seems to be a good SP for GLN?...even though GLN traded at 43 cents intra-day yesterday.
So your a small cap investor and your hoping for around for a 40% gain IYO??!!

40%?? in 6 months?
Yet, just 2 months ago...YOU POSTED...
a $500mill market cap with say 200 mill shares on issue (after some dilution) is $2.50 share price..... very tasty 10 bagger....

https://hotcopper.com.au/threads/general-discussion-banter-gln.4351926/page-603?post_id=36702979

Why did you post that just 2 months ago?
Please answer.

So AFTER great results from GLN (which you agree are good)...your SP target goes from $2.50 to 50 cent??

But wait...THERE MORE..."IMO" from you.
Even though the company is FULLY funded for drilling and JORC...
(this is stated in ASX releases and has been made in public comments by mgmt....plus you can call/email mgmt. right now to confirm.)
You take a off the cuff reply from Clive and make your...IMO...into FACT... that that GLN IS doing a CR for 10M!

Hey...it's all...just IMO so you can say anything you want RIGHT? Right??

Hang on...There more "IMO" nuggets from you...
If everything goes great for GLN and we get a 1M tone JORC...you...IMO...STATE...that GLN will probably get to 70 cents, maybe 80???

A 1M ton BG LCE JORC...In YOUR IMO is worth a MC under 100M??!!
(yes, I caught yous BS math attempt...right now the max SOI if after a JORC...AND a "successful" pilot plant is 195M shares...you added your pretend CR.)

Then you make-up...SORRY...IMO (because you're allowed to)
say the.... previously outlined indiciative market valuation of SDV is 200M....
Where and I hope you reply to this post to confirm...
WHERE...have you EVERY seen SDV valuation at 200M...please...tell us.

Because every ASX and Sedar release since 2012 (you know...the legal FACTS!) has SDV valued at 1.4B...I believe that was a upgrade from 1.1B.

That's ok...I'm sure you're right on your facts and IMO

However, do the courtesy of changing your sentiment to hold or sell...
as you sure aren't saying or telling SH's or potential holders to BUY by giving you IMO in every post.

You are DOWNRAMPING...while hiding behind the IMO protection cloak.

I have no problem with ppl. giving their opinion. I don't mind a debate or a heated discussion as most or you know from my post over the past 6 years under this name.
I'll even be 100% bullish on a company and at the SAME time criticise mgmt. or how they are proceeding (as I am currently with GLN poor marketing effort to tell the GLN story to the whole investment community.)

And I don't even mind downrampers or DTs coming on and saying the company is going out of business in 2 days to get a extra 2 cent buy dis-count. They say.. "sell" in their sentiment or not held.

YOU on the other hand...
Your a wonderful BULL of GLN that wants nothing but success for it...while every bullish post is PURE down-ramping. All the while you have a BUY...a buy to get CHEAPER shares from GLN shareholders? If I'm wrong, correct me.

Looking forward to your reply. Hopefully your answer some of the above questions and not just say...fair enough.