I know John likes to compare us with Rosebery because he's familiar with that deposit.
But let's not forget the takeover earlier this year of AZ mining. I actually think that's a good comparison to where we're at with MYL given they are in a similar stage of development (AZ mining a bit more advanced).
The table below shows that comparison. Please check my assumptions and make your own conclusions.
Notes:
- MYL SS only covers 23% of total indicated resource
- MYL's NPV and IRR are the mid range
- MYL's NPV and capex have been adjusted for ownership
- MYL's study doesn't include Ni and Co, to be included in PFS
- AZ's MC is taken to be S32's takeover bid
I know John likes to compare us with Rosebery because he's...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
