I agree some of this is rather concerning. However, it was...

I agree some of this is rather concerning.
However, it was stated in the announcement that the significant results were from a double blinded set up.
Assuming this research is along the lines of pseudoscience, how can that be explained?
Perhaps the end point results (brain wave changes) don't correlate to any behavioral changes but then that would discount the pre research determining the different wave subtypes.
I'm very wary of chiropractors delving into neurobehavioural areas and was rather skeptical with this one.
But I'm trying to look at the results skeptically and I'm finding it hard to disagree with doubled results.
The only way I see it as BS is if the statement is false. Which I bloody hope is not the case.