And indeed it shall. Thats what peer review science is all about. But i haven't seen any posts from you making any useful objective analysis of the study itself or presenting flaws in the protocols, approaches or reasons to doubt the results. Just a bunch of links trying to undermine Carrick because his original profession was chiro. Seriously if one was a fraud, there has to be easier places to hide out than Cambridge, Yale and Harvard.
Ann: Neurotech Presentations, page-101
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
