madamswer thanks for your response. What if I started a thread...

First 57 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
curiouswon

1,894 Posts.

98

07/09/18

14:10

Post #: 35466395
Share

Originally posted by madamswer ↑

- we did not stump up for very much cheaper SPP about 12 months ago"

Totally irrelevant.
A lot has changed in the progress and the development of the company since then.

"- the price has run up hugely (25% in 1 month 65% in two months)"

Irrelevant, as there may be many shareholders who still believe the company to be undervalued despite that recent performance. As case in point, I don't read too many comments on these threads about the company being overvalued.

"- there was a tight window for NEA to take advantage of institutions wanting to get their shares before ASX300 inclusion"

Since when is it the mandate of our directors to make life easier for the portfolio construction requirements of institutions? Why don't those institutions who need to get set of ASX100 inclusion simply do what they always have to do, i.e., buy stock on-market?

"- SPPs do take a little extra time and effort and may affect the underwriting price (and cost of this may offset the benefit)"

Not true. The underwriting price is set at the issue price (that's the very definition of the act of "underwriting")

"- getting massive $70M is great"

Sure, but they could have obtained some of that $70m from shareholders who might have been interested and keen to provide capital to their company.

"- few of us who are small holders and who purchased at somewhere between 5c and 50c would want to pay $1.60 (ie 3 to 30 times as much) for more"

Fine, so you wouldn't have been interested in participating, what about others who were?

Expand

madamswer
thanks for your response.

What if I started a thread with the headline:
"NEA DOES PUMP AND DUMP ON INSTITUTIONS AND SCORES $70M FOR GLOBAL CONQUEST."

Maybe most of us would say "well done NEA!".

PS Just for the record, I am not opposed to your views on shareholder access to capital raisings.

Last edited by curiouswon: 07/09/18

NEA Price at posting: $1.80 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Week 47 Wrap: HotCopper users' most watched; Brent lifts on Putin's scary letter; RFK dents CSL

LPE

Sales growth pushes Lovisa's fortunes (and shares) upwards

BTH

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

DUI

Panic, paranoia, and gangland politics: HotCopper users react to Dubber's missing $26M

SIG

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: Sigma-Chemist Warehouse merger creates pharma powerhouse

GRL

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 47, 2024

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

PYC

Scientific conference spotlights PYC's work on blindness disease treatment

There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...

First 57 Last

Add NEA (ASX) to my watchlist

madamswer thanks for your response. What if I started a thread...

Top Stories

Week 47 Wrap: HotCopper users' most watched; Brent lifts on Putin's scary letter; RFK dents CSL

Sales growth pushes Lovisa's fortunes (and shares) upwards

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

Panic, paranoia, and gangland politics: HotCopper users react to Dubber's missing $26M

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: Sigma-Chemist Warehouse merger creates pharma powerhouse

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 47, 2024

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

Scientific conference spotlights PYC's work on blindness disease treatment