An MIK is being applied to 500 holes (?) which implies a lot of samples but it's unclear what the variance of the samples is or why MIK. If there has been subsequent drilling, then the resource should (must?) be re-estimated. The idea of MIK is to deal with a highly variable population. Why does it say in the original report that a 40g/t top cut was applied?
Ann: Native Title Agreement Executed for Agate Creek Gold Mine, page-65
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
