CCE 10.3% 4.3¢ carnegie clean energy limited

Yes good point Mega, the time of vanadium redox has perhaps...

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 2,058 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 62
    Yes good point Mega, the time of vanadium redox has perhaps arrived. What better way to obtain a grant than with a newer product.
    I’d certainly like to be seperate from Lithium and it’s life expectancy limitations & more notably the Tesla factor.

    But for the current time being lithium is here for a while due to the cost reductions that have come about.

    I wonder what the cost of a comparible size Vanadium Redox Battery would be?

    Surely Sumitomo wanting a foothold in the Australian mining market and a grant to introduce a new “innovative product Malcolm” would warrant serious consideration and would:

    1. Get much more attention
    2. Possibly warrant more R&D tax breaks
    3. Have a longer lifespan
    4. Bode well for future projects

    If the cost of the Vanadium Redox Battery is 30% or 40% more that Lithium perhaps that’s the difference we could argue for a grant?
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add CCE (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.