Excellent news. I was desperately waiting for the MLEM on Roe 2....

Excellent news. I was desperately waiting for the MLEM on Roe 2.

As said before, I have always been a very big fan of Roe 2, even above Roe 1. Just hoping the geology here is nice and simple.

Note that the MLEM conductors are all indicated as shallow. (Also I wonder what the DHEM on hole -0022 showed? That is also a mystery.)

"Depth to top" of conductors is averaging around 100m vertically below surface. So if it is anything other than NiS, it should be possible to tell cheaply.

Past decent intercepts locally of 0.45% Ni have been below transported cover and between 100m to 200m vertically below surface. So it is all shallow, and easier to resolve one way or another.

Note the location of the more northern conductors running along the western flank of the ultramafic flow. I hope they are not the weaker C2,3, 5 conductors and are the strong C1 lot! That would be perfect. Sadly the only conductors marked are C4A and C4B.

So only 20% of the picture is divulged.

IF C1, being the other very strong conductor (there are two), was located northernmost right down the western flank of that ultramafic flow, joining C4_A then champagne time.

C4_A though is certainly in a favourable geological location!! to say the least! right on that flank.. maybe a big deposit sitting in a long flanking embayment??! dreams!

Anyway really great news for what is shown anyway.... Next bottle of home brew I put down, I will call it "Roe 2 Brew" in honour!

Good luck all. PP