My takeis that the 2 AC holes are not adjacent to the diamond hole and RC holes1-3 (main massive sulphide zone) asit says on page 3 that the "anomalous geochemistry intersected in recentaircore and RC drilling" was coincident with a geophysical anomaly fromthe recent VTEM survey. My understanding was that the VTEM anomalies were notin the area of the diamond hole, etc (two separate cluster zones - one being atCitra). Both were downgraded by SFR as paleo-channel drainage. Maybe they areagain of interest, or they have identified other VTEM anomalies? Perhaps similarto the weak off-hole conductor modelled from a DHEM survey in MWDD0001. Theoriginal release definitely said there were no DHEM conductors in the diamondhole or RC holes 1-3. It can't be too convincing.
I do likethe sound of a diamond hole 300m underneath RC hole 1. Nice and deep.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Ann: Morck Well JV Update
My takeis that the 2 AC holes are not adjacent to the diamond...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AUR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.383M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
5 | 1216025 | 0.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.7¢ | 250000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 103729 | 0.030 |
1 | 218636 | 0.028 |
1 | 300000 | 0.024 |
2 | 200000 | 0.022 |
1 | 100000 | 0.020 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.031 | 20000 | 1 |
0.034 | 194955 | 1 |
0.035 | 665000 | 1 |
0.036 | 58747 | 1 |
0.039 | 82835 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.12pm 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AUR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable