After perusal of X-sections (Fig1&2) with ASX announcement on 21st July it appears that the 180 change of drill hole azimuth was due to an interpretation of the dip of the mineralisation. See red outline of plus 1g/t Au and less than 1g/t Au intersections.
It would be very interesting to see full assay results (ie all assays for composite and 1m samples for AC and RC drilling.) In particular holes SPBA3740, 2833, 2832, SPBC0313, 0312, 0315.
Also what was the grade and width cut off parameters used to determine the aggregated intersections?. Contouring of assay results might better determine the geometry.
I would be very surprised if twinned holes don't reconcile.
After perusal of X-sections (Fig1&2) with ASX announcement on...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
