Share
133 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 13
clock Created with Sketch. 20/09/18
20:40
Share
Originally posted by onionhead69
↑
If Axiom KB got the mining licence for San Jorge and the ‘K’ in ‘KB’ stands for ‘Kolsori’ and within that subsidiary (I.e. Axiom KB) Kolsori is a 20% stakeholder, does that mean the the Kolsori people are going to benefit from mining in San Jorge? And if that is correct, then I wonder how this may influence their view of consenting to the Surface Access Agreement; being a major obstacle to progressing Kolsori. Not sure. Who can provide definitive evidence to support or reject this theory.
Expand
This rings bells somewhere !! I seem to remember cross-ownership between Kolosori & San Jorge landowners. Correct me if I've got it wrong. Do they each own 20% of the other ?
