700k was all for trying to terminate the ceo. When he was terminated for “failing to hand over his mobile phone in a timely period” for those who saw that before it was removed off social media.
There is no 249D cost other than a review of whether it was legally correct and had no loopholes. ajd anyway this would be in the current quarter not the past.
Agreed. Good question for the agm to spend 700k if investor funds and not feel like we desire be any reason or outcome. What could possibly warrant such ferocity Chris?
700k was all for trying to terminate the ceo. When he was...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
