Thanks for your research cc and I agree cc statements lacking...

Thanks for your research cc and I agree cc statements lacking evidence are annoying because anyone can say it's a duster or RMR is going to be a bonanza with no research and have 50% chance of being right or a 50% chance of being wrong, it either is or it isn't. Of course if they fluke the bet they are a genius and if they are wrong they'll slink off and go elsewhere. Not that I am against an opposite viewpoint, I'm not if it has researched information to support it for discussion.
The first large sellers were pip players and and were in it for the quick buck because the early sellers were there before the drilling started and there were a few bucks to be made there - this is really standard practise after a break it's called a pull-back – it is an opportunity for ex sellers or new buyers to re-enter if they please as the expectation is for it to run again. If you look at the micro market today it's May madness but you only have to have some positive happening and and they will go mad to re-enter. That’s the way it goes. We are waiting for reporting to eventuate for charts to move again. The company is very keen to be successful and would wish to be re-assuring as soon as possible with forward moving statements. Did anybody know when Sir was down to their last penny and drill that they would strike it rich – no they didn't and the general belief was that there was nothing there and they were wasting their last dollars, except for Mark Creasy of course who had a belief and could smell it as sometimes only a geologist can...The whole point is nobody knows completely yet, researched statements are the only leads yet that we have. It's not wise to panic yet, unless you must, as we know sometimes fortune favours the brave..