jarg,
WGR shareholders end up with, from memory, about 60% of the merged company and AAG shareholders about 40%.
Does that seem reasonable to you given we have:
- more cash
- more gold
- earlier development options
- infrastructure in place or nearby?
It's the wrong way around!
WGR's ROver field COULD be as good with a heap more expensive drilling. Then again, maybe not.
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
