@freeheel Yes nice results for 57D & 58D (pity they couldn't...

@freeheel

Yes nice results for 57D & 58D (pity they couldn't mark up the diagram correctly for 57D saying "&" instead of "incl" but that's MOD for you) or did you miss that?

So they have a roughly 200-250M corridor between (just west of ) 49D & 58D to follow & see where it leads & if it widens out again etc.

Strangely neither 57D or 58D went deep enough to hit the 23M zone of (1.2% & 22g/t Ag) at 49D that started at 275M depth !! Given it was found at 241M in 51D, 253M in 50D it would appear to plunge deeper as you head towards 57D.

Whereas the 5 upper zones (in the line from 51D to 58D) were found at 210M, 214M, 205.5M, 201.6M, 208M

So they may have missed the bonus for now.

The other 2 results you'd say were around expectations & thus improves confidence in the resource model there using.

LOTM