re: Ann: ISRAELI BREAKTHROUGH WITH CO2 TO FUE... 'Should the...

re: Ann: ISRAELI BREAKTHROUGH WITH CO2 TO FUE... 'Should the presentation not accurately reflect the correct percentage of the royalty?'

I totally agree with that. Of course it should.

The next presentation released to the market needs to address the royalty issue once an for all in a clear, concise and logical manner.

In fact in all future releases related to NewCO2Fuels, whether it be in the Annual Report, Presentations, Quarterly Reports, Newsletters and ASX announcements, there should be a brief, but clear and concise reference to GER's royalties.

Not only for current shareholders but also for prospective shareholders.

GER is attracting a lot of attention at this point in time. It'd attract even more attention with clearer communication with existing shareholders and the wider investment community as a whole.

As I said previously I got into GER for the Energy Efficiency business, not NewCO2Fuels, but obviously there would be many people out there in the opposite situation to me, being interested in GER for the NewCO2Fuels technology.

It would be a step in the right direction for the management of GER to clear up the royalty issue once and for all rather than allow the uncertainty to continue, especially so considering the reason for the uncertainty in the first place stems from the mixed messages they have been sending.

If you have royalties of 42.5% then why on earth would you release a presentation titled 'Long-Term Potential Revenue Scenarios' with figures equating to royalties of 1%?

It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I continue to hold, but hope for better, clearer communication from GER management in the future.