Ann: Invalid Section 249D Notice, page-70

The company were made aware of the mistake late in the trial but decided to progress it!
Only for reasons to fact find but it is in this announcement ..... released on the 29th May
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20180529/pdf/43vd4ls3ntm0t1.pdf


Is anyone surprised that the CRP-C grant has been rejected again?
Is anyone surprised that this wasn't announced or communicated to the shareholders?
I might add, that the reason for the rejection is also word for word identical to when they announced the 1st rejection and one does really need to question the current management's ability to (a) source expert consultants to fit the task and (2) with all the advice they have been giving from these "experts, ' to then say they will go back to the very same consultants that have just failed in guiding them to rinse and repeat!!!!!

What is Trench doing?
Is he still the "in the fullness of time" being groomed for the COO position?
Or was that just more fluff to keep the shareholders interested?
As the broad acre field tomato trials never progressed, why wasn't the share holders informed considering that they made an announcement that they were starting?


cheers
All IMO only