Ann: Invalid Section 249D Notice, page-67

@cfp you are neither blind nor a fool and you know the history and all the anns which are there.
If the paper work to Monash did mention 4X strength, don't you think they would have diluted it accordingly while conducting the trial? Again when was the error identified? Did the board inform the market of the error as soon as they became aware or where they waiting for the approval from their accountant( as was the reason given by GPP in an earlier occasion for delay in another ann)?