I cannot wait to see the 249D re-served, likely only requiring a typo correction or a box ticked and I strongly encourage for it to be re-served. Based on what I have seen of this management, all I can conclude for myself at this point is that this is just a delay tactic to get what is in today's acquisition announcement over the line.
Ann: Invalid Section 249D Notice, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 127 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
