It's coming down to who is supposedly more clever, traders or LT investors?
I've never claimed it's not smart to trade, but companies need LT investors. If the entire market was trading to such tough criteria it would cease to perform its function. It's one reason why some companies seek venture capital and don't bother to list. They don't want the aggravation while they go through the tough times.
Also I don't want to live like a trader and do the things that are apparently required. Call it a moral and/or lifestyle choice.
But as AZS has finally met their criteria, as some of us knew it would, it's not we LT investors who are right, but them.
I'm only interested in calling people to account if I think they've lost perspective. Which I have done many times. This can be controversial. So they've been researching me and realised one thread is intensely controversial. Big deal.
The latest ann is perfectly consistent with what I've been saying for a long time. The Germans like due diligence and they like quality. This is demonstrably true. It means the market has undervalued AZS. Also demonstrably true.
These guys make many mistakes, on substantive issues but you can't make anything stick. I make a mistake with calling out the wrong poster and somehow it's a catastrophe.
As for making personal attacks, I leave it to the experts.
AZS Price at posting:
30.0¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held