The DD holes would've been drilled in the better parts of the deposit, where as much cheaper RC was used more extensively, eg to define the lower grade extremities. So the RC is likely more representative of the whole deposit.
It is worrying the EXU geologists have done 'marginally fit for purpose' sampling, does this raise any doubts about the rest of Tampia resource drilling?
The DD holes would've been drilled in the better parts of the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
