Share
1,834 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 92
clock Created with Sketch.
08/12/18
10:27
Share
Originally posted by eshmun
↑
How many RMS holders do we need coming here with their ill informed opinions.
We don’t need RMS, we don’t want RMS, so what are you all doing here commenting on this result which you clearly have no idea about.
We are talking about an extremely high grade deposit with a strike length of at least 1100m which remains open. The nugget issue has been adequately explained and only a fool would not understand that. Look at the grade of the diamond drilling, it is not in any way consistent with a low grade deposit with a grade of 1.4g/t, that’s just what the competent person is constrained to estimate by the rules they are allowed to follow.
Have any of you novices had any experience drilling clay. It’s puggy and it can get stuck in the drill rod stems and in the face sampling bits. I’ve drilled some puggy/plastic clays which harden with applied pressure to a level where you can’t even imprint them with a finger nail. Now imagine the problems that could occur trying to pass these sample through a splitter to get a homogenous sample. Some people have no idea. Good luck to all RMS holders with the Dec quarter. I think I’d rather be entering 2019 with $8 million of new funds for exploration of an exciting high grade shallow depoist than sweating it on a big hungry mill with no mining feed and some ad hoc mining plans.
If you people aren’t interested, why are you here commenting. Let EXU get on with their business in piece. Esh
Expand
get on with their business in piece. Esh
Do you mean get on with their business in peace?
and
by getting on with the business of advancing utterly unrealistic timelines such as a 'bankable feasibility study this month' . What they mean is that the MD has a plan for a BFS or more likely a process for a plan for a BFS.
There will be no piece , sorry peace, for EXU shareholders whilst he remains MD.