Your point is well taken siameseparrot but sometimes there has...

Your point is well taken siameseparrot but sometimes there has to be a little short term pain for longer term gain. Hopefully someone out there in the HC community will be close enough to the company to raise some of the matters mentioned here and maybe the company can learn to better deliver its message. I would be surprised if the company thought that there was no improvement necessary.

We've got to ask ourselves the question, what is exactly holding back the share price? I'll put a general question out there. After reading and listening to the Wilcherry Hill Project Feasibility Update (18/10), the Boardroom Radio Feasibility Study Update (26/10) and the IFE Brisbane Mining 2010 Presentation (8/11), who can tell me whether it's the buyer or the seller who is responsible for the international shipping costs and who derives the benefit of any future reduction in costs? Bear in mind, the company has quoted its revenue and costs purely on an FOB basis rather than on a CIF basis. If not everybody is clear on the answer then the message isn't being delivered properly and that might just be the problem.

Stagman