Eastwest, you might be right about the high grade mineralisation...

Eastwest, you might be right about the high grade mineralisation ending around hole 278 (leaving a mere 10kms or so of the good stuff!), but I don't think so?

Another explanation is that 278 was not drilled deep enough and too far away from the FRF. It did not intersect the fault and ended in breccia surrounding the fault. It is likely that the fault is further to the North.

If the dip of the fault as shown in 275 is projected down then the fault would be about 40m to the North of the first intersection in hole 278.

This will be a good test of the geo's ability to re-interpret and adjust the modeling and drilling....

Who'd sell now?