YES!!, 2m at 47% Pb, you made me go and check the announcement....

YES!!, 2m at 47% Pb, you made me go and check the announcement. That is a great result in the existing resource.

However I think where I find the announcement a little disappointing is in the exploration hole WFDD278.

Going back to early May, this was reported about WFDD278..........

" We are pleased to confirm that hole WFDD278 intercepted the Py1 at shallow depths (from 22m) followed by an approximate 16m interval of mineralised Py3 (from 132m). Geological logging of this interval notes visible chalcopyrite and sphalerite and textures indicative of cobaltiferous pyrite. "

Then today the actual results did not match up with the earlier hope...........

" Although only low-grade assays were achieved (16m @ 0.25% Cu, 0.05% Co, and 25g/t Ag) the cobalt and silver are significant over reasonable widths of the prospective Py3 and given the very limited drilling in this entire western region of the Walford Creek Project the exploration team sees this as a very positive exploration success. "

I suspect if the results from out west had been good to great, we would have seen a good rise in the SP.