TwinTurboCelica..
I do understand 100% sample recovery is only possible when the stuff gets mined..
But in resource delineation i have seen companies use 85% minimum sample recovery..
Tar only told us about the 39% recovery in the 1.64m you brought up, and the lower part of the first drill being 38% recovery and not worth looking at, or words to that effect..
I wonder how much bettee the overall sample recovery was.. 50% or 60% ?? Etcetc..
Nevertheless.. i still think grades closer to double what was reported by tar may be possible simply based on the recovery factor alone...
For now it doesnt matter..
Cos to get similar 0.52% at such widths or close to it, over remainder of acreage, would still indicate very large resource
TwinTurboCelica.. I do understand 100% sample recovery is only...
Add TAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $5.648M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4134848 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 249009 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 29/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| TAR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
