I didn't read this as particularly positive either. Grades...

I didn't read this as particularly positive either. Grades seemed to be lower than had been previously indicated for that hole and less intercepts. I not saying the grades arent good, but they are lower than was previously thought. Is that not a fair assessment?

Can I ask re "true width". in this instance is tis actually refering to the depth of the strike? Given it is a vertical hole? Saying that intersections are close to true width is saying that they expect the ore to be flat lying? So we still dont actually know how wide the intercepts are, so have no idea about the size of the resource yet? Or am I way off?