I have no issue with YT having representation on the BOD,
given their ownership level they should have a voice there.
What does it say though when they have 3 representatives all
of whom voted against the Glencore financing (which might I remind
you was voted Deal of the Year in its category) and 98% of
shareholding voted in favor of it?
It would appear that interests have drifted apart.
I have no issue with YT having representation on the BOD,given...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
