Messed up the post above, requesting it to be removed by...

Messed up the post above, requesting it to be removed by mods

Here it is fixed up:
RB,

A 10,000sq ft facility with 240 units produces 4500kg pa. These are double stacked already. 1 unit produces 3.1kg (7lbs) per 60 day cycle, which is 18.6kg a year per machine.
If you look at just about any investor presentation on the slide "Annual Yield Comparison" it shows a room of 12 units, but below that it says 24 so we know that 4500kg pa in 10,000sq ft is already double stacked.

To reach 18,500kg per 10,000sq ft (37,000kg per 20,000sq ft), THC would need 994 4' RotoGro units.
Going to use 960 units here because it's a multiple of 120 and 120 RotoGro units is what fits in 10,000sq ft if we just count the bottom row.
960 RotoGro units stacked 2 high would need roughly 40,000sq ft including walkways
960 units stacked 4 high could be done in roughly 20,000sq ft including walkways
960 units stacked 8 high could be done in roughly 10,0000sq ft including walkways

I was using this comment section as a notepad here but I'm gonna post it now.
What THC are claiming is possible to do with RGI's machines if they stack them 8 high

The machines alone will cost them $9m+ though, and that's only if RGI agree to sell them.
Why would we want to sell these for JUST cash to our competitors? If RGI sell these machines to THC, they're going to take a piece of THC either in equity or profit share.

Someone please correct me if my maths is wrong here