ONT 0.26% $7.68 1300 smiles limited

Ann: Half Year Report and Accounts, page-13

ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM
CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
ANNOUNCEMENT SPONSORED BY PLUS500
CFD TRADING PLATFORM CFD Service. Your Capital is at risk
  1. 7,936 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1554
    Thanks for that snippet of insight, @we9smia ,

    It might go some way to explaining what would otherwise been a quite strange result

    I say strange because while full-year revenue fro FY15 was flat on FY16, it a story of two quite different half-years:

    Revenue in DH15 was up 6% on pcp, but JH16 Revenue was 8% lower than pcp.

    And that in itself is not overly remarkable, then what is certainly worth remarking is that:

    Pre-tax Profit was 11% higher for DH15 than pcp but for JH16 was a whopping 21% higher.

    So, looking at JH16 in isolation:

    Revenue down 8%, Profit up 21%.

    The difference is obviously somewhere in the Operating Cost line, which was an astonishing $2.14m (15%) lower in JH16 than the cost base of JH15.

    The main drivers of this were lower Employee Expenses (down by $1.78m, from $8.2m in JH15 to $6.4m in JH16... that's an 22% reduction. Surely not?) and lower D&A charge (down by $0.26m, or 20%, from $1.28m to $1.02m).

    Now the lower D&A charge looked a bit cheeky to me, at first glance, but then I noted that the depreciable asset base fell by 18%, so it passes the smell test.

    But the thing that has got me flummoxed - and it is the single biggest driver of the result in the second-half - is this dramatic fall in the employee expenses.

    I can't see any IT project, no matter how effective it is, delivering that sort of turnaround.

    Unless... and this would be a very positive point ... unless the costs of the IT upgrade were booked in JH15, which inflated that figure, which would make some sense (and it would, of course, be a good thing).

    For fuller context, here is a listing of Employee Expenses over the past four half-year periods

    DH14: $5.66m
    JH15: $8.18m (was this elevated level due to the IT spend?)0
    DH15: $6.89
    JH16: $6.40m

    Whatever is going on, it has left EBIT margin at a decade-high.

    I guess the best thing to do will be to ask the $90,000 pa man (that's right, still no pay rise awarded to Dr Holmes) himself, but before I do, does anyone see anything that I am missing?
    Last edited by madamswer: 11/08/16
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ONT (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.