24m @ 1.51 g/t gold (including 4m @ 5.68 g/t gold & 4m @ 2.63...

1. 24m @ 1.51 g/t gold (including 4m @ 5.68 g/t gold & 4m @ 2.63 g/t gold)
2. 20m @ 1.63 g/t gold (including 4m @ 6.19 g/t gold & 4m @ 2.8 g/t gold)
3. 20m @ 1.06 g/t gold (including 4m @ 4.07 g/t gold)
4. 
   12m @ 1.24 g/t gold (including 4m @ 3.43 g/t gold)
5. 
   12m @ 0.57 g/t gold (including 4m @ 1.24 g/t gold

the above are quotes from the ANN this morning, and they are the same from last one..

i am thinking you are talking rubbish and misleading information...

what the hell you learnt by Subtract 4m @6.19g/ton and [email protected]/ton from [email protected]/ton????

who told you that?

the finding can be simply interpret that:

the hold of HFR005 from page 6 stated from 52m to 72m down hole there is 20m width with grade of 1.64g per ton, and for "4m @6.19g/ton and [email protected]/ton from [email protected]/ton", it means there are 4m width pay dirt at a grade of @6.19g/ton within this 20m minerlaztion ranges ...

always the longer the width, the lass condense the grades, so why you stated you subtract them?

they are there so what are you talking?

why there are so many people just blindly follow and dont even do research.....

i believe if you cant get what you post right and keep deformation about GTE management, you will be report to GTE ....