Ann: Greenfields Gold Discovery at Yandal West Project, page-69

Okay, a lot of people have said "go away and stop posting negative views about this find"... Not in those words, but in various ways. But there hasn't been much actual engagement with the facts.

Unfortunately I don't know enough about the geology of the area or the regional mines to understand whether there is truly a parallel with other nearby major finds. But at least @knowbs engaged with the issue and posted additional facts. As a general principal if you disagree with a poster but have no new facts, or can't identify a flaw in their reasoning, then you're wasting everybody's time responding. Nobody really cares if you suddenly doubt yourself and are now angry about it. Venting is childish and unhelpful.

I haven't seen any engagement with @pangea 's calculation of the inferred resource. Is there a mistake? I can't see it.

Also @pangea has shown a very close knowledge of Great Western, particularly with this comment: be cautious of the company's historic tendency towards hyperbole.

I strongly agree with this sentiment. The company has a long history of wildly overselling its potential and disastrously under-delivering. My only argument with @pangea 's observation is that it's not just a historical tendency... it extends right up to the very recent past. Followers of Great Western's Western Australian explorations will recall words in announcement titles like "exciting results", and references to jaded geologists' eyebrows.

As an investor trying to keep a realistic perspective on your investment, you should be welcoming negative concerns and engaging with the information provided so it can test and strengthen your view. Not slapping down the messenger.