Your missing the point here little fella, the weight of the core...

Your missing the point here little fella, the weight of the core doesn't matter in the calculation.

You can use any number you like lets say 1m of core was 50 kg of material, is that ok by you or is that number a manipulation number aswell? so that would be 1ton of material so it should contain 1.63 g/t of gold, you following ok?? read again if need be.....

Hope your not confused yet?? now you take the other two 4m lengths of core assume they also contain 50kg of material being from the same hole and all, pretty hard to manipulate that isn't it.... so what do you get? 1.2 grams of gold and 0.56 grams of gold.

You getting all this am I explaining it slow enough?

Now you take the 1.2 grams and 0.56 grams add them together and you get 1.76 grams of gold that bigger than 1.63 grams of gold, did you manage to follow?

I broke it down extra simple just for you cause you are are the only one who seems confused by this simple math problem, now you can take that method and use any core weight you like go buck wild with it make a spread sheet if you have to.

There is no way to manipulate the core weight as you claim it ain't possible, durrrrrrrrrrr

Further more if I am manipulating the calculation then simply do your own and show me a calculation using any core weight you want that gives the 20m sample a greater amount of gold.

Stop shooting down my figures and do your own dopey