Pretty irresponsible to report these Fe grades at all. No mention of blanks or duplicates being used to confirm the accuracy of these results. If you cant release lab assay results wIthout these checks why is it ok to release inferior HH-XRF results? Seems like a desperate attempt to report some good news before the AGM which I'm sure management is a tad worried about considering their underperformance this year. Any JORC competent geologist would've waited the extra month when they have the lab results and adequate QAQC measures. Putting themselves at risk of misleading the ASX if these results come back significantly different to what they've reported now. Not sure the disclaimer that the results are expected to be different will cut it. Especially if they come back under the reported Fe.
Pretty irresponsible to report these Fe grades at all. No...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add HAV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
0.010(4.76%) |
Mkt cap ! $58.57M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 21.0¢ | 22.0¢ | 21.0¢ | $36.43K | 170.1K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25059 | 21.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 22.0¢ | 107100 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.32pm 04/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| HAV (ASX) Chart |
