Ann: Gold Extraction Results from Ema and Tres Estados, page-118

First 118 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Skol

15,705 Posts.

275

18/08/17

12:55

Post #: 26590221
Share

Originally posted by Nodferatu ↑

It's got nothing to do with Skol, I asked a question to see if he/she could contribute to the thread. I also asked for other inputs from the same question from others. All I got from you was a google link and a claim of how simple it is. I'm not interested in extraction methods that work with already known simple mineralisation types, because clearly, as the company have already stated, this is not a 'normal' mineralisation. If they can't do 'standard' assays, whats the chances of 'standard' extraction? You're the expert apparently, so you tell me.

It's really not that simple, and as a geologist, you'd know it's not that simple - so are you really a geologist? Or just a google warrior.

I have my doubts, given the assumptions (that you call facts) you have so 'conservatively' put out. None of the geo's I work with make any assumptions like yours and consider them fact. Or is it that have access to information that no one else does?.

Either way, you perceive your opinion as fact, any newbie with no experience it the exploration/mining game would read your posts like they're hand on heart truth, even though there is no public confirmation from the company to support your claims. "630,000,000t" of ore... given they haven't drilled, might as well add a few more 0's at the end. What's the difference.

"Obviously they're not going to use a process that involves a 33 day leach. They got 360g/t after 18 days of leaching followed by routine fire assay and they're continuing to optimise the process."

Obviously? how do we know that? Information available tells us otherwise - 14/18/33 days just for assays. At this point, we have no evidence to support your claim, yet again. "Continuing to optimise the process" tells me the current process isn't viable or economically scalable. What does it tell you? That doesn't mean they won't find a process that works, but again, with the information available.... there's many assumptions being put in place in the absence of fact.

Expand

360g/t?

Sounds a lot, I'm not a geologist, I have no expertise in the matter but here's the results from Crater Mining which drilled and assayed in the Tapajos Mineral Zone.. The most they got was 115 g/t.

No mention of platinum group metals.

Read the last sentence, and that's after drilling.

"There has been insufficient exploration for a defined mineral resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in the delineation of such a mineral resource."

http://www.cratergold.com.au/irm/Sh...?CategoryID=212&HideTopLine=True&masterpage=2

BBX Price at posting: 20.0¢ Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

Quit before you're fired: Russia bans uranium exports to USA, duplicating extant US ban

US election outcomes: Key economic and market takeaways

PNN

Power gets set for 1000-metre maiden drilling program in Brazil

GRL

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

BTH

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

There are more pages in this discussion • 108 more messages in this thread...

First 118 Last

Add BBX (ASX) to my watchlist

Ann: Gold Extraction Results from Ema and Tres Estados, page-118

Top Stories

Quit before you're fired: Russia bans uranium exports to USA, duplicating extant US ban

US election outcomes: Key economic and market takeaways

Power gets set for 1000-metre maiden drilling program in Brazil

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

Featured News