No one would touch the Lance project. It's a demonstrated technical failure. Low pH is a potential solution. Equally, it may prove to be a higher technical risk than the original design.
To claim the low pH design will shift Lance into profitability is fanciful and nothing more than doubling up on the PEN gamble.
As I've mentioned before, low pH ISR is no less risky than the original chemistry.
No one would touch the Lance project. It's a demonstrated...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PEN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.08 |
Change
-0.015(1.37%) |
Mkt cap ! $274.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.09 | $1.12 | $1.08 | $237.1K | 216.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 18320 | $1.08 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.10 | 4076 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.28pm 04/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PEN (ASX) Chart |
