SHJ (ASX) Ann: FY19 Half Year Results Announcement Date

Originally posted by Bobspongo: ↑

The SHJ price fell 75% in early 2016 when the company did a review of its modelling and recovery rates and changed the way it accounted for WIP (work in progress) in its accounts. The same happened to SGH when it undertook the same task.

My background is in law so I felt I understood the business model but I accept my knowledge of the accounting side of the business was inadequate when I bought. The manner in which WIP was accounted for by SHJ (and SGH) prior to January 2016 had the effect of making the balance sheet seem stronger than it was (when amended) and resulted in a substantial reduction in guidance and share price when it was amended.

By buying practices between 2013 and 2016, and so adding to the WIP, the company continued to appear profitable until the accounting methodology changed in January 2016 resulting in the the balance sheet / P + L becoming vastly weaker. That is, buying practices for the WIP kept the accounts looking buoyant.

A second issue is that if a law firm that is valued at $20 with $2 of earnings buys another firm for $2 with $1 of earnings, its $3 of earnings should increase the value of the law firm to $30, assuming the market still values the acquirer at 10-times earnings.The problem arises, however, if the acquired earnings are not sustained, increasing the need to do ever large acquisitions. That in turn pressures the balance sheet, forcing the company to raise more equity, and debt. Finally, every legal practice is unique so achieving synergies of scale is more difficult such that buying WIP doesn't equate to improved profitability. It's the reason why private legal practices most often grow organically rather than making regular purchases of smaller practices.

I am emboldened in my view insofar that once the manner in which WIP was accounted for in the accounts the purchase of smaller practices ground to a halt for nearly three years.

I am not sure that it affects the share value but I am also a little troubled by the concept of the listed law firm. The law firm has an obligation under the Corporations Act 2001 to act in shareholder's best interests but under the various legal profession acts its first duty is to the court. That is probably an academic/philosophical arguments but may show why most other common law jurisdictions haven't taken to listing law or accounting firms with the vigour Australia has.

I have had more success researching and buying miners (OMH) or tech (NEA and APT) so will steer clear of lawyers from here on.

For the avoidance of doubt (to use a legal phrase) I am not a down ramper. I am sure there are plenty of people here who have a lot more knowledge of the merits of SHJ. I am more from the "once bitten twice shy" school.

Expand

Bob,

May I respectfully submit that your outcome with SHJ depended largely on the price you purchased at.

I always buy companies where people are "once bitten twice shy" can you see why such a strategy may work? The natural consequence is that safety can be found sometimes among stocks everyone considers risky.

Legal practices are traditionally conservative in accounting for WIP and making acquisitions. Do you think that the value on SHJ's books is overstated still?

Its helpful as an investor, whether long or short not to make a value judgement on a company. I like the conservatism of private practice but "growth is away from security".

That's neither right or wrong, Quindell was a massive dissolving fraud looking for a mark which it found in the knobs at SGH.

P.S. anarchism for the win u dirty stinking capitalists.

No.	Vol.	Price($)
1	14962	86.5¢

No.

Vol.

Price($)

14962

86.5¢

Price($)	Vol.	No.
87.0¢	4339	1

Price($)

Vol.

No.

87.0¢

4339

No.	Vol.	Price($)
1	28	0.840
3	5177	0.825
1	1	0.820
1	7723	0.800
1	936	0.750

No.

Vol.

Price($)

0.840

5177

0.825

0.820

7723

0.800

936

0.750

Price($)	Vol.	No.
0.850	56508	9
0.865	1155	1
0.890	14633	1
0.900	10402	3
0.940	30000	1

Price($)

Vol.

No.

0.850

56508

0.865

1155

0.890

14633

0.900

10402

0.940

30000

(20min delay)
Last 86.5¢		Change -0.005(0.57%)		Mkt cap ! $144.2M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
87.0¢	88.0¢	86.5¢	$46.29K	52.61K

Ann: FY19 Half Year Results Announcement Date, page-48

Week 47 Wrap: HotCopper users' most watched; Brent lifts on Putin's scary letter; RFK dents CSL

Panic, paranoia, and gangland politics: HotCopper users react to Dubber's missing $26M

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: Sigma-Chemist Warehouse merger creates pharma powerhouse

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

Scientific conference spotlights PYC's work on blindness disease treatment

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 47, 2024

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

Sales growth pushes Lovisa's fortunes (and shares) upwards

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Ann: FY19 Half Year Results Announcement Date, page-48

Top Stories

Week 47 Wrap: HotCopper users' most watched; Brent lifts on Putin's scary letter; RFK dents CSL

Panic, paranoia, and gangland politics: HotCopper users react to Dubber's missing $26M

Dale Gillham's weekly wrap: Sigma-Chemist Warehouse merger creates pharma powerhouse

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

Scientific conference spotlights PYC's work on blindness disease treatment

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

HotCopper Highlights: Your most watched stocks for Week 47, 2024

Bigtincan's Board backs Investcorp offer: Why a NASDAQ listing could be game-changing

Sales growth pushes Lovisa's fortunes (and shares) upwards

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)